State Of Florida Non Compete Agreement

This is the area in which competition bans are most likely to be defeated. It could be argued that the non-compete restrictions are too broad and go beyond the legitimate business interests of the employer. Florida`s statutes provide that legitimate business interests include: if the non-compete period is too long, it may not be applicable. Contracts of six months or less are deemed valid, while contracts longer than two years are considered ineffective. However, if the evidence is sufficient, the court may find that an agreement of more than two years is appropriate. Employers have the burden of proving that the duration of the agreement is appropriate. Ultimately, a non-compete clause impacts your livelihood for a while and has a big influence on you. This is not something you should take lightly from you or your employer. If you have been bound by such an agreement, it is important that you immediately speak to an employment attorney in Florida to discuss the details and implications. If you have already signed and agreed to the terms, it may be necessary to challenge the agreement in court.

In such cases, we represent them throughout the dispute. Under Florida law, a non-compete clause can only protect legitimate business interests, among which: remember, in the event of non-competition and violation, regardless of the circumstances in which the employee left your company, failure to take action may expose future enforcement attempts to retaliation or discrimination. The business entity concerned may wish to obtain a guarantee from the receiving party that it does not follow, contact, is not in contact with its current or past customers, that it is not in contact with them or that it has no activity with them. If the recipient intends to comply with this limitation, select the control box for the second statement. However, a Florida district court later invoked Transunion as an authority and followed its position. In Lucky Cousins Trucking, Inc. v. QC Energy Resources Texas, LLC, 223 F. Supp.3d 1221, 1224 (M.D. Fla. 2016), the District Court was asked to issue a publication ban under Florida`s non-compete clause, but partially objected to it because of the harm suffered by the party against whom the injunction was sought. The court cited the Transunion decision of 11 43 On the other hand, a decision of the Florida District Court of Appeals, rendered less than three months after Transunion, refused to consider the harm suffered by the worker.44 A non-compete clause protects the legitimate business interests of an employer.

but it may feel like you, the employee, are punishing you. A non-contest can make it incredibly difficult for you to find other useful work in your field. 44 In Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Romon E. Colina, M.D. LLC, 192 d.3d 491 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) decided that the question of whether the worker – who is the subject of an application for an injunction – would suffer greater harm by imposing the injunction could not be examined, given that the non-compete clause in Article 543.335(1)(g) expressly prohibits such consideration. In this decision, the second TCA relied on and received support from the first TCA from the first TCA to Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. . . .

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.